The Best Expensify Alternatives in 2026: ExpensePoint vs Other Tools
Looking for an alternative to Expensify? Compare ExpensePoint with Ramp, Navan, SAP Concur, and Emburse. Review features, pricing, and pros & cons...
Comparing Concur competitors? See how ExpensePoint and 6 other Concur alternatives stack up on pricing, support, and implementation. With real G2 reviews.
SAP Concur has been one of the biggest names in travel and expense management for years. Many finance teams inherited it as part of an SAP ERP decision and rely on it for expense reports, travel bookings, and invoices. But with a 4.0 out of 5 rating on G2, Concur's legacy model no longer leads the pack. More companies are comparing Concur alternatives that offer better interfaces, easier implementation, and clearer pricing.
The best Concur alternative depends on what you need from expense, travel, and spend management. Here's a comparison of Concur vs. several top alternatives, including ExpensePoint, to help you choose the right solution for your team.
| ExpensePoint | SAP Concur | |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Quality of Support (G2) | 9.9 / 10 | 8.0 / 10 |
| Pricing model | Charges a per-user monthly price | Custom quotes, often priced per expense report, plus add-on fees |
| Implementation | Live in 10 to 14 business days | Routinely runs for months |
| Corporate cards | Card-agnostic with direct feeds from issuers (Amex, Chase, Citi, and more) and real-time transaction data | Third-party card feeds; transactions can take days to appear |
| Best For | Mid-market to enterprise with simple to complex workflows | Large enterprise (with deeply embedded SAP ERP) |
Concur is a legacy travel and expense platform that has served enterprise teams for years, and it remains a default choice for organizations using the SAP ERP ecosystem.
For finance teams that now expect consumer-grade software and predictable pricing, the limitations below explain why so many are evaluating Concur alternatives.
| Feature/Category | ExpensePoint strengths | Compared to SAP Concur & Others |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use & User Satisfaction | ExpensePoint scores consistently high in user reviews, especially around value for money, customer support, and functionality. On Software Advice, ExpensePoint gets ~4.8/5 vs. Concur's ~4.3 in total score. | Concur reviewers consistently describe expense reporting as sluggish, with multi-step workflows that require admin help to finish. ExpensePoint's intuitive design drives the adoption that legacy tools struggle to earn. |
| Approval Workflow & Policy Enforcement | ExpensePoint supports complex approval workflows, detailed policy compliance setups, and reporting on a single platform with no additional costs. | Concur delivers deep compliance controls, but reviewers report paying extra for add-on modules to unlock them. ExpensePoint includes multi-level routing and policy enforcement at the base price. |
| Mobile & Receipt Capture | ExpensePoint's mobile app offers quick receipt capturing, automatic receipt reading, and GPS mileage tracking. | Concur's mobile experience trails modern alternatives, and manual receipt entry remains a top complaint in reviews. ExpensePoint matches the capture speed of mobile-first tools while adding enterprise controls. |
| Integrations & Scalability | Direct integrations with NetSuite, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Xero, Microsoft Dynamics 365, and SAP Business One, plus direct credit card feeds from 25+ issuers and support for 90+ currencies. | Concur integrates natively with SAP ERP, but connecting it to NetSuite or QuickBooks frequently requires extra setup costs. ExpensePoint connects directly to major on-premises and cloud-based ERPs. |
| Implementation & Support | Free white-glove onboarding, plus admin and user training. Most teams are live in 10–14 business days. Every client gets a dedicated account manager who picks up the phone. | Concur implementations routinely run for months. Support means ticket queues, and service calls can carry extra charges. |
| Cost / Value | Many users rate ExpensePoint highly for "value for money." The per-user price covers workflows, policy enforcement, reporting, and support. | Concur custom-quotes every contract and often charges by the expense report, so costs climb exactly when your team grows. For teams deeply embedded in SAP ERP, Concur's native integration may still justify the premium, but most others pay for depth they never use. |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise finance teams that want automation without card switching or per-report fees | Large enterprises deeply embedded in SAP ERP |
Here are some other leading alternatives to SAP Concur, and what they offer:
| Tool | Strengths / Key Features | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| Ramp |
|
|
| Navan (formerly TripActions) |
|
|
| Expensify |
|
|
| Emburse Professional (formerly Certify) |
|
|
| BILL Spend & Expense (formerly Divvy) |
|
|
| Zoho Expense |
|
|
To choose the right expense tool, here are the criteria you should evaluate:
ExpensePoint wins on the four fronts where Concur draws its harshest reviews: support, pricing transparency, time-to-value, and flexibility.
Every criterion above comes back to the same question: where do your team's hours actually go? If they go to chasing receipts, untangling reconciliations, and waiting in support queues, the platform is costing you more than its license fee. The right alternative gives those hours back, at a price you can predict.
ExpensePoint gives finance teams a powerful expense management platform without the enterprise overhead. Book a demo
This comparison was created on July 15, 2026 and is subject to updates and changes.
ExpensePoint is the best SAP Concur alternative for mid-market and enterprise finance teams. It rates 4.7 out of 5 on G2 versus Concur's 4.0, charges a per-user monthly, and connects directly to the corporate cards you already hold.
Companies leave SAP Concur for four consistent reasons: a dated user interface that employees avoid, per-report pricing that climbs with growth, complex ERP integrations that sometimes require third parties, and slow support that carry extra charges.
No, not if you choose a card-agnostic platform. ExpensePoint works with your existing corporate card programs, so you preserve accumulated rewards and negotiated terms. Platforms built around their own card, such as Ramp, require migrating your card program to get the full value.
Yes. ExpensePoint integrates directly with NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, Xero, Microsoft Dynamics 365, SAP Business One and other major on-premises or cloud-based ERPs with no third-party middleware required.
Yes. ExpensePoint is card-agnostic and pulls direct daily feeds from more than 25 card issuers, including American Express, Chase, Capital One, Citi, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo. You keep your existing rewards, credit lines, and banking relationships.
Yes. ExpensePoint includes free onboarding, admin and user training, and a dedicated account manager with every plan. Most teams go fully live within 10–14 business days. Concur implementations, by contrast, routinely stretch into months, and reviewers report paying extra support along the way.
Looking for an alternative to Expensify? Compare ExpensePoint with Ramp, Navan, SAP Concur, and Emburse. Review features, pricing, and pros & cons...
Looking for an Emburse Professional alternative? Compare ExpensePoint to Emburse (formerly Certify) head-to-head, plus 4 top competitors—pricing,...
Discover the top 5 reasons why companies struggle with audit readiness and learn how proper preparation can save time, reduce costs, and eliminate...